The period between 2016 and 2021, when with four friends we published a periodic zine, was amazing. We managed to print a total of eight issues, each with a specific theme. The recent economic crisis killed it off, but anyhow, it was a hugely rewarding experience. Towards the end of last year nostalgia started to creep in. So, I began pondering about handcrafting a one-off book that contained my photographs in the zines.
Weighing various options and my own capabilities, also trying out a few different ideas, I decided on spiral binding proper RC prints; something I'd never done before. To keep the size reasonable and manageable I also decided to only include the 26 photos from the first four issues. If it looked good, I could produce Vol2 sometime later. I was in no hurry and began printing the photos over several months; one or two at a time during every darkroom session. This is the end-product:
I think it turned out quite OK. Very spartan. Very simple. Too spartan? Too simple? I wish I had the abilities and imagination of a Peter Beard...but, oh well, I am what I am, and it's still better than nothing.
You know Omar, as an ex-Graphic Design graduate, I can honestly say that looks really excellent. What a genius idea! Never thought of that. I would have thought it would be fairly economical to produce too. You've inspired me, and that doesn't happen very often!
ReplyDeleteHope you are well and still planning your future.
That's high praise Phil. Thanks a lot. I'm glad you like it.
DeleteI wish single weight FB paper were still available. I had actually imagined this with such a paper. Although I don't know whether SW FB paper is as rip-resistant as RC.
Praise where praise is due Omar - it looks excellent.
DeleteI remember we used to use single weight Kodak and Kentmere FB at college (as par for the course - RC wasn't nearly as developed as it is, though this being said, Cibachome paper was an RC and that was superb) - it was alright. Maybe Ilford Portfolio - it's quite stiff isn't it, though you'd be better with it being more pliable like a proper book rather than being stiff like a child's book!
Yeah, RC Portfolio is quite thick and would have made it rather stiff. Single weight FB would've been best. You know what, when Ilford did those questionnaires some time ago and asked what product we would like to have I always said single weight FB paper. I must've been the only one asking for it!
DeleteThere's always older stuff coming up on Ebay over here, but then you've no guarantee with that stuff. I've seen people saying unopened, with the box lid to one side and the plastic bag on display . . . .
DeleteThat looks great. My photos are loose in an archival box. That's not bad, but I could send a bound collection to friends and family. Or sell them around tourist areas, ha-ha.
ReplyDeleteThanks Marcus. Those loose prints in the boxes tend to accumulate and before you know it you need an extra room for them :-P
DeleteI just moved into a larger apartment. Now I just need a job to pay for more prints. :)
DeleteGood luck with your job search Marcus!
Delete