It is called "Gözaltı", which literally translates to "under-the-eye". It also means "being under surveillance" and "being in custody"; plenty of subtext there. Self-publishing the zine had quite a few pain points, one of them being coughing up the 100 Euros per photographer. 500 Euros, that was roughly the cost of 2000 zines, each 16x24cm in size, with 32 pages. 100 Euros per photographer, every 6 months, for a zine we give away for free, without expecting anything in return. It doesn't sound too much, but it was a problem that came up in our discussions quite often. Why throw good money out of the window? We talked about trying to find a sponsor and what not, but eventually continued to cover all costs from our own pockets.
Anyway, the moment we were done with the edit and design of our fifth issue and had to collect the money, one of our photographers decided he'd had enough and pulled out. Obviously, you can't blame anyone on money problems; everybody has their own circumstances after all. So, with four remaining in the group, we had the challenge of completely redesigning the issue, and the question of whether we would continue as four people or whether we should look for another photographer. In the end, an excellent photographer whose style we thought would enrich the zine, and who, as a person, would also be a good fit to the group, accepted to join. And indeed, with her contribution of pictures and her help in the edit, I think issue 5 turned out really well.
I should very briefly summarize the concept of the zine. We aimed to publish an issue every 6 months. Beforehand, we decided on a theme, usually a simple word. For example, the theme for issue 5 was "Game". Then we have about 4 months to produce photos that fit the theme. In the last 2 months we try to finalize the edit, the sequencing, the interior design, the cover design and the printing. Once printed, the cycle begins again. And in the meantime, we also deal with distribution of the printed zine, another can of worms.
The editing & sequencing was always the highlight for me. Because here we would all gather in a suitable space, with all pictures laser printed in small format which would be easy to pin up on a board, and we would all talk about the photographs. It was extremely enriching to hear everyone's opinion on each picture and why this and that sequence would or would not work (which could be an entire new post). This was our final edit, but there were many other candidates prior to this.
A social media presence, especially on Instagram, is also a must for visibility. So, after publication, we prepared all sorts of "content".
Here are a few short notes about the above photos:
1. A spontaneous scene in Istanbul. I had a Pentax 645Nii with its standard 75mm/f2.8 lens with me. This camera is a workhorse but somehow I can't fully bond with it. I could say it's a close friendship but not a love affair. I'm not exactly sure why, but the way it extends towards the front, especially with anything but the 75mm, must have something to do with it. The film was Tmax400.
2. A playground in Adana in southern Turkey. Made with a Leica M6 and 35mm/f2 ASPH Summicron. My standard companion for 20+ years. The film was Ilford FP4.
3. Barcelona, as I already mentioned. The film was Tmax400.
4. A zoo. The camera was a Nikon F4 (which I hate) and the 45mm/f2.8 pancake (which I love). The film was Ilford Delta 100. The fine detail on that 30x40cm print I find quite remarkable.
Quite a motley of cameras...that can't be a good sign.
I had two more photos in that issue which I've not included in this post.
Hi Omar - a brilliant post, and probably the thorny problem of all such small press publishers over the decades. Over here, during punk, zines were distributed to record shops - they sold for tiny amounts of money barely covering costs, but it was done because people were in love with the subject and indeed the process. It is a hard one though - money is always an issue. I think you've all achieved some wonderful goals - and the photos, of the ones I have seen and these (which I haven't) are marvellous.
ReplyDeleteI take it it is dead in the water now? Such a shame. It's possible that being in Turkey your market was limited - I think if you'd got out and had it seen in say, the UK or the States things would have been different. I passed the copies you sent me around at the DCA photo forum, and people were well impressed, and I was proud for you. Gözaltı looked very professional, and also rather beautiful - who knows, if you'd gone on, I could see a Taschen overview in 10 years time ';0)
BTW the Nikon looks GREAT.
Keep up the great work.
Phil
Thanks Phil. Yes, it seems quite dead. It’s a shame really. The last issue would have been great. All photos were ready, we even had a draft edit. But the offer we got from the printing press was outrageous. Anyway, we had a good run, and nothing lasts forever.
DeleteIt’s gotten out of Turkey and has been around the world quite a lot actually.
Cheers,
Omar
(Somehow I could only comment as Anonymous)
Hi Omar - a great shame indeed. Printing costs are expensive, but you know I think there's a lot of profiteering going on simply because of "the cost of living crisis".
DeleteAs for commenting - Blogger is stupid, but you can get around it.
Click Reply; Enter Comment; Comment As.
It then gives you 'Anonymous' by default, however the triangle to the side of that also gives you 'Google Account' and 'Name/URL'. Click 'Name/URL' and enter your own name.
You'll then see 'Edit' and 'Continue' - click 'Continue' and you can comment.
It's DAFT, but is the only way around it - don't think Google is too bothered about Blogger anymore.
All the best as always.
Phil
On the laptop commenting with my own name works just fine (as I do now), but yesterday I tried commenting on the phone and couldn't get it to work. Didn't try "Name/URL" though :)
DeleteBlogger does show it's age, it all looks a bit archaic.
Thanks!
Omar
Never tried on a phone. I think Blogger still gets a bit of mileage, but because we're not "content creators" in the modern sense, I get the feeling they think it's not really worth their while. I mean have you tried the whole Analytics thing? Jings!!
DeleteAnalytics, haha, yes. My blogs had/have so little traffic there's not much to analyse :)
DeleteThe old Analytics was supposed to move to a new platform on July 1st (just checked an old mail from google), but I haven't bothered with it so far.
Apparently even though they were urging you to 'move!' they'll do it automatically . . ..
DeleteHi Omar - me again - hope you don't think I'm a stalker or anything, but I have to say, I've been looking at these photos a lot (I keep the page open because I don't get notified of new stuff) and I don't know what it is, but I chuckle every time I look at them - and I've looked at them (especially the top three) many times. I think you've hit the 'decisive moment' right on the head in all four - wonderful!
ReplyDeleteIf you get a chance you could do your own online version of Gözaltı - could be easy enough to do without the printing costs. I realise it isn't exactly the same, but it would be something.
Once again - well done - love them.
Well, what a nice message Phil! Thank you very much indeed. I'm really happy you enjoy them.
DeleteWe thought and discussed doing an online version, but in the end decided against it. Yes, we could save some trees maybe, but we all feel that doing a print version is much more rewarding. Well, what do you expect from a bunch of old-fashioned B&W film photographers who love printing in the darkroom.
I don't know...even major magazines are going full online (e.g. NatGeo), so we are probably all wrong and should talk about it again. And our last issue was practically ready.
Might be worth testing the waters!
DeleteAnd praise where praise is due ';0)